The fitness function was implemented as a linear model denoted in (1).
The latter model, denoted in the following by ColiCore, covers the central metabolism of E. coli.
Based on these genotyping values, the values of g and p were generated according to the following five different models (denoted M1 M5), as depicted in Figure 1 figure supplement 2A: M1, a causative model v → g → p; M2, an independent model v → g, v → p; M3, a reactive model v → p → g; M4, v → g → p and v → p; and M5, v → p → g and v → g.
Therefore, the models denoted with a RMSE value in bold represent the lowest RMSE achieved "within" the relevant model group only that consists of 4 different models only.
Often interest is in the difference in between 2 alternative models, denoted.
The last two models, denoted by models (1) and (2) in Table 6, appear to be the best models of symptom predictors for influenza infection.
> -wrap-foot> > -wrap-foot> Paramestimatesmates of the most parsimonious model; random intercept model with heterogeneous among-year residuals, are given along with denominator degrees of freedom and F tests according to Kenward-Roger (KR) The most parsimonious model is denoted in bold face and the annual residual errors refer to this model.
The difference in models denote different sizes, and in some case lighting options.
The comparison of a null codon model where selective pressures are constant both along lineages and among sites (H0) against a branch-specific or "free-ratio" model (denoted Br in Tables 1 and 2) showed an extensive variation of the ω rate ratio among branches in both data sets (Tables 1 and 2).
The odds ratios obtained from the latter models denote the change in odds ratio by moving from one deprivation group to the one immediately more deprived.
