Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(4)
The response surface models for the fluidity characteristics are discussed in "Statistical models and discussion", together with detailed interpretations.
The review is divided into four parts: Crash safety, On-road driving for forward facing children, Numerical whole body models, and Discussion and future outlook.
The main stages of the soft-sensors' design are discussed and the development illustrated in detail, starting from the preliminary preprocessing of the available process measurements where sample and variable selection has been performed, toward the calibration of the regression models and discussion on the performance results.
It also has an online environment (MICEspace) for collation and analysis of data from communal models and discussion boards on subjects such as the welfare of ageing animals and common endpoints for intervention studies.
Similar(56)
The third section presents the models' estimation, results for each model and discussion.
The following are the details of the simulation setup, energy model, and discussion of the results.
We conclude with a presentation of the numerical stability, convergence and simulation of the proposed model and discussion of its novelty.
Key features of LWOM are explained in Section 4, whereas the implementation of the method on European call option model and discussion of results is given in Section 5.
Numerical results for an example include verification of the proposed method by comparing with finite element method (FEM) results; comparison between the present model and the traditional rigid track model and; discussion of the influences of track damping and vehicle velocity.
Altogether, the data suggest that a disulfide bridge could form between S225C in S4 and C136 in S1, in the channel closed state (see model and discussion).
This data suggests that following depolarization, a disulfide bridge could form between R228C in S4 and C136 in S1, which stabilizes the channel open state (see model and discussion).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com