Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
Considering the method described by Hsieh et al. [ 22] for determining the sample size required for the estimation of a correlation coefficient and for linear regression models, a sample of size 16 is sufficient for estimating a correlation coefficient equal to 0.65 with a level of significance of 0.05 and a power of 0.20.
Assuming a type I error of 0.05, power (1-β) of 0.80 and including up to 5 independent variables in the final models, a sample size of 61 subjects would be needed to detect an explained variance of at least 19% on the WOMAC function scale(r = 0.43) and a sample size of 110 subjects would be needed to detect an explained variance of at least 11% on the WOMAC function scale (r = 0.33) [ 10, 13, 48].
Similar(58)
In the proposed prediction model, a sample is estimated by using the linear combinations of its P past samples and Q future samples as prediction context.
In order to support the mathematical model, a sample TPV apparatus in laboratory scale based on an IR emitter has been designed and assembled.
Thus, the simulated data were generated from the model A sample size of 1000 was used.
For that chosen model, a sample from the joint posterior distribution is formed by randomly sampling 1000 iterations across all its chains.
We constructed a simulation model for a sample population of middle-aged Japanese men whose systolic blood pressure (SBP) levels are normally distributed (130 ± 20 mm Hg).
The model used to set the priors for amino acid data was an average of all the available models and a sample was obtained each 10 generations.
We reviewed the following F.R.S. and G.M.R.S.-F.R.S. models as a sample of what is available; the radios were tested in both the country and the city.
Then we replicate the Cawley, Han and Norton models on a sample of immigrants only.
Multiple regression models included a sample with unknown values for these adjusted variables.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com