Suggestions(2)
Exact(2)
Use of General Circulation Model (GCM) precipitation and evapotranspiration sequences for hydrologic modelling can result in unrealistic simulations due to the coarse scales at which GCMs operate and the systematic biases they contain.
This modelling can result in the incidence and progression that meet our desired definitions, but not those of regression and disappearance.
Similar(58)
Others have shown that eschewing traditional distribution models can result in big success, in comedy especially.
An incorrect selection of the parameters of the model can result in inaccurate simulation predictions.
Attempts to implement alternative staffing models can result in resistance as staff struggle to link work practice with patient numbers.
The simulation study shows that ignoring random effects in modeling can result in unreliable factors identification and estimation.
It is seen that performing co-segmentation based on the GrabCut model can result in efficient optimization and prior model generation.
The introduction of constraints in tensor models can result from the system itself that is under study or from a system design.
Further, Pelletier et al. [55] demonstrated that two different allometric models can result in estimated annual emissions from deforestation that differ by up to 48%.
Deviations from this simple model can result from numerous factors, such as contributions from surface anisotropy [5 7], interaction with an antiferromagnet [8 10] or a surface spin glass phase [11], or dipole dipole interactions [12, 13].
Furthermore, (independent) open learner models can result in significant learning gains and increased self-assessment accuracy (e.g. Brusilovsky et al. 2015; Kerly and Bull 2008; Long and Aleven 2013; Mitrovic and Martin 2007; Shahrour and Bull 2009).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com