Since no tissue-specific effect can be assigned to experiments provided in [ 33], we considered whole brain average value R a l l T as a modelled knockout effect for comparison.
For comparison, alternative larviciding strategies were modelled by simply assuming that the emergence rate and hence biting density of vectors is equivalent to coverage of the aquatic-stage mosquito population [ 30, 31].
For comparison, the flexural behaviour is also modelled numerically using finite element analysis (FEA), and analytically using the Classic Lamination Theory (CLT).
Figure 8 also presents three cases of modelled cache performance based on the ratio, L S, which were chosen for comparison.
For comparison, a DCM was inverted where SCR were modelled as evoked responses with constant latency.
For pine, Mehtätalo (2005) modelled parameter C dependent on qmD, so that in this case there were no constant value-pairs available for comparison.
The modelled values of CRE (CREFIR, CREAW and CRE) for optically thick clouds (optical depth, τ=10) are shown in the left panels of Fig. 4; observed values (explained below) are shown in the right panels for comparison.
For comparison, consider Pacquiao.
We modelled costs and effects at population level in four countries: three of the large, middle-income BRIC countries, Russia, India and China (excluding Brazil, for which we had insufficient data), and one lower middle-income country, Zambia, for comparison.
For comparison, they used Yahoo!
