For the LES, since the solver being used tends towards having dissipative qualities, the subgrid scale (SGS) model is omitted, giving a numerical type LES NLESS).
In the Moran model, it is not clear how the analogs of full-sibs and half-sibs should be defined, so the Moran model is omitted from this discussion.
The simulations of the KTP 004 and KTA 002 profiles were the least successful and suggest that the OG model is omitting factors which influence the diffraction profile.
For 223Ra and 99mTc, the quadratic term of the model was omitted because it did not significantly improve the model adjustment (linear regression, p ≥ 0.05).
If the model were omitted, this would result in a zero mean wind, which is less desirable than a mean wind equivalent to the mean wind of the model.
Thus Cox model was omitted from study.
The drain model was omitted after careful review of the survey question deemed it too vague for a meaningful interpretation.
Participants with missing values for any of the variables in the regression model were omitted from the analysis.
The dairy cattle data were analyzed using all six models, while the animal-CLASS and sire IC models were omitted when analyzing simulated data.
Accuracies from pedigree-based models were omitted in this analysis because they are not expected to depend on π, in the observed π range.
