As regards application, the model with ratio-dependent functional response in this study can be used and improved to describe the interaction among the diseased-species in ecosystems, the susceptible species, and additional species with a certain biological property.
The best fit branch model for each region of ago-1 and for dcr-1 was the two-ratio model, with one ratio of non-synonymous to synonymous rates (ω=dN/dS) for the fast evolving copies (− 1b copies) and a different ratio for the slow evolving copies (ago-1a or dcr-1/1a) copies (Table 3).
Compared to the model computed without the I/T-G ratio, the model with the ratio performed significantly better [areas under the ROC curves (AUCs), 0.78 vs. 0.83, respectively; P = 0.04].
In another Cox model with WT1 ratio and log transformed pre alloHCT WT1 ratio as predictors of time to relapse, only the WT1 ratio was significant but the log transformed pre alloHCT WT1 ratio was not significant (data not shown).
The model with overhang ratio 0.26 amongst the first three models and the model with aspect ratio 0.6 amongst the next three models have been found to experience maximum negative peak pressure (Cpmin).
As a result of the tests, it was found that the response amplitude of a model with aspect ratio of 6.8 is larger than that of the model with aspect ratio of 1.8.
The only difference in the training of the three groups was the simulation model: Group 1 used the available commercial model with the ratio of 8 students per model; Group 2 used the teacher made model with the ratio of 8 students per model; Group 3 used the teacher made model with the ratio of 2 students per model.
The mechanical properties of CL-20/RDX cocrystal explosive can be effectively improved and the cocrystal model with molar ratio in 1 1 has the best mechanical properties.
Ion composition in the auroral lower F-region has been obtained by correcting the EISCAT composition model with the ratio between the measured and modeled ion temperatures.
Data were simulated under a general multiplicative model with Risk Ratio between 1.05 and 2.00 and disease allele frequencies between 0.1 and 0.9.
Backward elimination techniques were used to select variables for the final model, with likelihood ratio tests used to determine significance (P < 0.05).
