Sentence examples for model with ln from inspiring English sources

Another alternative is a linear model with ln(1 + y) on the left-hand side of the equation.

Summary test statistics for a linear mixed model with ln(length) as response variable.

Figure 3 illustrates the significant associations of variables in the parsimonious multivariate path model with ln(Y).

The HR for DFS and its confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a stratified Cox proportional hazard model with LN metastasis (N1/N2) as stratification factor.

Summary test statistics for a linear mixed model with ln(larval length) as response variable and replicate as a random effect.

Following Krewski et al. (2009), who reported that the logarithmic function of PM2.5 was a better predictor for mortality from ischemic heart disease than was the linear model in analyses of the ACS cohort, and based on the shape of the concentration response curve (see Figure 2C), we fitted a model with ln(PM2.5 + 1).

Table 4 presents the ORs of lung cancer associated with the CSI (model 1), with ln (1+PY/5) (model 2) or ln (intensity+1) × duration (model 3) in our population of men and women ever smokers, each metric of smoking consumption being considered as a continuous variable.

To improve normality of urinary As species and reduce the influence of potential outliers, we also fit models with ln-transformed urinary As [ln(As)].

The p-values of interaction terms were > 0.38 in the models with dichotomized PAH and > 0.25 in the models with ln-transformed PAH.

To explore whether the association between urinary As and SCC varied by duration of current water supply use, we stratified participants according to the median duration of current water supply use (< 17 years or ≥ 17 years) and estimated ORs for SCC using covariate-adjusted logistic regression models with ln-transformed urinary As as the exposure.

In a model with FAZA LN T/M 1 h, clinical stage (HR = 2.46; P = 0.029) and FAZA LN T/M 1 h (HR = 2.89; P = 0.014) were statistically significant predictors, and in a model with FAZA LN T/M 2 h, clinical stage (HR = 4.06; P = 0.002) and FAZA LN T/M 2 h (HR = 6.67; P <  0.001) were statistically significant predictors (Table  4).