Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(12)
His idea was that if the ball-and-chain model were correct, a larger "ball" would not alter its effectiveness as a plug.
If the feature detection model were correct, the FFA neural response should be stronger for faces than houses, irrespective of the subjects' expectations.
This would indicate that, if this model were correct, the previously described persistence in the cycle itself would correspond to long-term shocks that occur during "atypical" periods.
Surely if the classical model were correct, we'd have clearly seen its negative impacts by now.
If instead a recessive model were correct, our estimates would be conservative.
If this model were correct, the post-training blockade of the feedback circuit might be expected to impair appetitive LTM.
Similar(48)
The apparent AUC-values of each model were corrected for optimism using 10 × 10 cross-validation.
This modelling tool is not intended to prove that any particular model is correct, nor is it intended to derive a model for assembly.
If Hawkins and Ahmad's model is correct, this cannot happen in real neurons.
Second, if the PAGE economic model is correct, we're currently badly underestimating the costs of our greenhouse gas emissions.
This fully illustrates that the numerical model is correct and that analog calculation is feasible.
More suggestions(15)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com