In addition, particle deposition patterns for each model were assessed visually.
Four kinetic parameters of the model were assessed by processing the time-series measurements of pulse-amplitude modulation fluorimetry.
Three cases using the simulation model were assessed: (a) measured residual stress by hard turning; (b) measured residual stress by grinding; and (c) free of residual stress.
The matching results of the B-C model, Van Genuchten (V-G) model, Li model, and our improved model were assessed in comparison with the test data.
Bias and inaccuracy of each model were assessed by median prediction error (MDPE) and median absolute prediction error (MDAPE), respectively.The M/P propofol Cp in the 4 PK models revealed bias in all 3 compartmental models during the bolus and short infusion regimens.
The accuracies of the regional geoid model, provided by the First Institute of Oceanography (FIO), State Oceanic Administration of China, and the DTU10 MSS model were assessed by a GNSS buoy experiment.
The accuracy and robustness of the micromechanical model were assessed by simulating nonlinear response and crack patterns of masonry in different geometrical, boundary and loading conditions related to axial and diagonal compression tests.
This is done by first comparing the CFD simulation results of wind velocities around a single building with and without elevated design with those obtained from a wind tunnel experiment, and two turbulence models, the Delayed Detached Eddy Simulation (DDES) and the RNG k-ε model, were assessed.
Three ordinary kriging models, spherical, exponential and linear model, were assessed respectively.
EDV, ESV, LVEF, and regional wall thickening and motion (17-segment model) were assessed using Quantitative Gated SPECT software (QGS, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA).
Errors in tree AGB estimates due to the allometric model were assessed by varying ε (Equation 3 and 4) following the methodology of Maniatis et al. [18].
