Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(60)
Analysis of variance showed that the contribution of quadratic model was significant for the extraction yield and antioxidant activity whereas linear model was significant for pectin content.
Analysis of variance showed that the contribution of a quadratic model was significant for the responses.
The obtained Model F-value of 267.73 and probability F < 0.0001 implied the model was significant.
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that the contribution of quadratic model was significant for the responses.
The results indicated that the quadratic model was significant for these two responses.
The obtained p-value of 0.000 indicated that the regression model was significant.
The analysis of variance indicated that the established model was significant (P < 0.05).
Analysis of variance showed that the contribution of a quadratic model was significant for the pectin extraction yield.
This value indicated that the quadratic model was significant.
The results of the validation showed the model was significant.
Therefore, the quadratic model was significant for color and COD removal.
More suggestions(15)
specimen was significant
models was significant
specimens was significant
model was first-rate
model was 6-in-1
model was cynical
model was incomplete
model was shiny
model was sluggish
model was real
model was black
model demonstrated significant
model predicted significant
model faced significant
model showed significant
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com