Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(35)
The performance of the model was relatively good in the case of D1 (R2 = 0.50, RMSE = 0.02).
Furthermore intention significantly predicted the likelihood that participants had reduced their household fruit and vegetable waste at follow-up; however, the amount of variance in behaviour accounted for by the TPB model was relatively small (5%).
Between 750 and 850 km, the average accuracy of the models was generally better than 15% and the choice of the atmospheric density model was relatively inconsequential, both in conditions of low and high solar activity.
The mean WTP value estimated by Probit model was relatively higher than the mean WTP value estimated by the survival analysis.
Compared with the amount of variance in QLT scores explained by the Background Model, the amount of additional variance explained by the Curriculum Model was relatively low, and its practical significance should be considered with caution.
The model was relatively insensitive to changes in assumptions about the duration of the infectious period and infectious contact rate infections among vaccine failures.
Similar(25)
The model is relatively straightforward.
The model is relatively simple and testable.
Though comic books have been available digitally for some time, the paid subscription model is relatively new.
The model is relatively low-risk, because it is safely invested in cash much of the time.
Of course, a new pricing model is relatively easy for competitors to copy, so the advantage is not that sustainable.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com