Ai Feedback
Exact(33)
The correlation coefficient (R2) of the BP model was lower than that of ELM model.
However, the decreasing rate of the proposed algorithm model was lower than those of the other two algorithms and the accuracy of the proposed algorithm model was higher than those of the other two algorithms in all cases.
The central pressure for T1215 (Figure 9c) simulated using the coupled model was lower than the RSMC-Tokyo best-track central pressure at around 0000 UTC on 25 August 2011 during the rapid intensification phase.
The correlation coefficient value for air-time model was lower than the bottom and top surface models due to the fact that air temperature varies a lot and the materials can distribute the temperature more homogenous through the surface.
The amount of sludge produced under the conditions optimized based on the results from the model was lower than the amount generated by chemical treatment with FeSO4·7H2O and non-hazardous in nature.
When plasma vitamin C and carotenoid concentrations were used as objective indicators for fruit and vegetable intake, the explanatory value of the model was lower, but again more variance was explained among realists than among overestimators.
Similar(27)
A perceived weakness of this model was lowered job satisfaction of physicians.
The electronegativity of nanotube in the AIV model is lower than those of other models are.
As for the C10+, the prediction of the model is lower for both systems.
As we can see, the average value for null model is lower.
The deviance of the four-dimensional model is lower regarding the two-dimensional model, but not significantly lower.
Related(20)
system was lower
pattern was lower
prototype was lower
sample was lower
example was lower
figure was lower
specimen was lower
models was lower
specimens was lower
model was reduced
model had lower
model were lower
model presented lower
model was better
model predicted lower
model provided lower
model showed lower
model gave lower
model was trickier
model was inferior
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com