Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
However, we found that subjects processed between 1.54 and 3.2 blocks in a row (i.e., without model visits in between), a rate that is below the range of the generally assumed WM capacity of 3 to 7 items [e.g.], [ 12], [16,35].
Similar(59)
If we assume that the same total memory capacity is used for both cases, we should expect that the number of blocks processed per model visit in the simple conditions is about twice the number processed in the complex conditions.
She went public on 23 June 2005, alleging that as a model visiting New York in the early 1980s, she met Cosby and they had a brief affair.
In our healthcare model, visits to the ED are almost always a result of acute, unanticipated medical events.
As a consistent result, we found that for the simple pattern condition (both in the near and far case), model visit duration is shorter, the number of model visits is smaller, and the number of blocks processed after a model visit is larger than in the complex pattern condition.
Also, when comparing near and far conditions, the number of blocks processed after a model visit is larger in the far condition, indicating that more memory has been stored.
Patients in the specialist model visited more health providers than patients in the dispensary model (P<0.001), and so was the dispensary model compared with the integrated model (P = 0.005).
The 20-year-old model visited Bang Bang Tattoos in New York City at her pal Rihanna's recommendation.
In sensitivity analyses, we modeled ED visits in various ways: as a binary (none versus any visits), a differently aggregated ordinal (0, 1 2, and 3+), or an uncategorized count.
In this model, "visit number" equals "follow-up years".
On average, a patient in the specialist model visited four health providers until treatment completion compared with only 2.2 providers for a patient in the integrated model (P < 0.01).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com