Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(9)
The total sample Model M0 (Additional file 2: Table S2, Section A) is the theoretical model; this did not fit our data set due to the method effect.
Although possession of >4 copies copies was also associated with an increased risk of IVIG resistance (OR = 5.12, 95% CI = 0.57 46.34, p = 0.146) (Table 3, Full Model), this did not achieve statistical significance.
However in a different rabbit model and also murine model, this did not hold true [ 52, 53].
In fitting with the model, this did not, however, lead to any detectable process of reproductive isolation.
When including creatinine and pre-existing cardiac disease (including atrial fibrillation) as independent variables in the model this did not affect the model or contribute with any significance.
When age – and additionally squared age – was included as a continuous variable in the regression model, this did not substantially alter the results.
Similar(51)
Should this require the deletion of parts of the model, this does not invoke many delete (D) states.
However, as shown in [29], due to the less robust spectrum domain models, this does not provide for optimum results.
Given the still substantially higher price tag on gas-fueled models, this does not necessarily reflect number of units sold.
It is difficult to test this model, though this does not invalidate it.
Since the accuracy level dropped dramatically for the communication model, this model did not "cross-validate".
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com