With the GLUT2 model the least square deviation between the observed and model predicted = 0.16, and with the SGLT model the deviation = 0.189.
One can also adjust the shape and scale parameters a and b to model the deviation from uniformity.
When the relatedness and structure in the panel were included in the model, the deviation from the null hypothesis was corrected, indicating improved control of this type I error.
The evaluation was focused on the correct centering of the targeted site, the presence or absence of perforation, the drilling depth, the deviation of the vestibulolingual direction relative to a reference axis on the control model, the deviation of the mesiodistal direction relative to a reference axis on the control model, the global drilling time.
the correct centering of the targeted site, the presence or absence of perforation, the drilling depth, the deviation of the vestibulolingual direction relative to a reference axis on the control model, the deviation of the mesiodistal direction relative to a reference axis on the control model, the global drilling time.
Understanding and modelling the deviations from Newtonian behavior of synthetic-based drilling fluids (SBFs) is essential to design optimal flow systems and efficient cuttings transport.
In the remaining models, the deviations are functions of both the gene and the list vertex degrees.
If the functional representation of the input data is estimated separately from the dynamical model parameters, the deviations from the true underlying dynamics of the input are not considered in the estimation of the model parameters.
To test this hypothesis, we fit the same model to the deviations from the full male tracks (Figure 2) and to the deviations calculated only after the turtles had crossed the Gulf Stream.
In nlsList model(s), the deviations of the coefficients from their means are treated as parameters that need to be estimated.
