Ai Feedback
Exact(9)
Model tests show that both runners have good power performances.
Results from a series of laboratory model tests show a significant reduction of flow velocities across the entrance channel with longer breakwater length and higher crest elevation.
Rupture velocity model tests show that both peak slip and slip location (slip depth) are dependent on Vr; peak slip reaches ∼55 m for the lowest rupture velocities, and ∼35 m for the fastest.
Model tests show that this method is accurate and reliable and may be adopted to perform a number of effective calculation analysis of engineering for the design of double pressure shell.
Results of model tests show that the FBG hoop-strain sensor demonstrates good performance in the circumferential strain measurement, and can be considered as a practical device for pipeline health monitoring.
Synthetic model tests show that for the chosen system architecture and objective function, the particle swarm optimization approach depends very weakly on the rate of communication of the processors.
Similar(51)
Predictions of sliding distances by the new method are then compared with measurements from physical model tests, showing very good agreement with observations.
This extensive dataset is presented, discussed and then used for comparison with two commonly used overtopping prediction formulae based on small-scale model tests showing their tendency to underestimate the prototype results.
Model tests showed at high speeds, waves generated by the design of the hull would leave some lower parts of the ship uncovered including the magazines.
First, traditional null model tests showed support for negative species co-occurrence patterns among plots within islands, but not among islands.
Model testing showed no systematic bias and good precision in the estimation of the TMF for PCB congeners but an apparent underestimation of model calculated TMFs, relative to reported field TMFs, for PEs.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com