Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
The model testing revealed remarkably good agreement between the predicted and measured metabolic fluxes, which validates the presented model.
Similar(59)
A recent systematic comparison of 2D and 3D physical block model tests revealed wave amplitude differences of up to a factor of 17.
The single factor model tested revealed the poorest fit to the data of all the models.
Model tests revealed BM was the best supported (AIC = 8.21 compared to OU = 10.2) for the abdominal vertebrae data and also for log FR data (AIC = −100.12, compared to OU = −98.16).
Additive and dominant genetic model association testing revealed no statistically significant associations between post treatment ODI and VAS LBP change and any of the tested markers.
The simulation tests reveal that it is feasible to establish the model using LS-SVM.
Variables including age, BMI and etiologic risk factors (NASH, hepatitis C and hepatitis B) were included in the multivariate models because univariate testing revealed significant differences (p<0.05) in distribution between the diabetic and non-diabetic cohorts.
The ANOVA for repeated measures followed by least significant difference testing revealed that Aβ25-35-induced Aβ25-35-induced Aβ25-35-inducede location of the platformodelmiceed to the control group (P = 0.000).
Formal diagnostic testing revealed no evidence of multi-collinearity in any of our statistical models.
Forensic testing revealed nothing.
Further testing revealed bile duct cancer.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com