Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
As the Mass-action model and Michaelis-Menten model techniques do not consider diffusion, they did not perform as well as the S-system.
Similar(59)
Mainstream object-oriented modeling techniques do not account for these agent-specific aspects.
We attempt to make the case that traditional modeling techniques do not work for complex systems by introducing the notion of 'hard' and 'soft' variables.
While covering Shale Analytics, it focuses on reservoir modeling and production management of shale plays, since conventional reservoir and production modeling techniques do not perform well in this environment.
Another limitation of our analysis is the modeling techniques do not specifically identify conditional relationships, which are likely to be ubiquitous in meta-dimensional data.
At present our modeling techniques do not allow for birth-cohort trends, although our diagnostic tests revealed little evidence of cohort trends, with a negligible impact on the estimated basis functions and forecasts.
Although the examined modelling techniques did not outperform logistic regression analysis, we can see a role for these techniques in providing a deeper insight into the interrelationships between predictors and outcome.
Our present hybrid modeling technique does not arise from an existing modeling framework.
Most of finite element model updating techniques do not employ damping matrices and hence, cannot be used for accurate prediction of complex frequency response functions (FRFs).
Most of the model updating techniques do not employ damping matrices and hence cannot be used for the accurate prediction of complex frequency response functions (FRFs) and complex mode shapes.
Since NAR models obtained using standard system identification techniques do not always adequately model the reaching motions, in this paper we present a method that uses a least-squares estimator with constraints to impose the location of fixed points in the model.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com