Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(5)
Figure 7 shows the modeled SAV area on 8/15/2009; the model results compare favorably with the measured SAV area in July August 2009.
Model results compare well with furnace test results.
The model results compare fairly well with the experimental results of a MBR pilot plant.
Model results compare well with measured organic carbon profiles and stocks.
Model results compare favorably with the experimental data, and are consistent with FEM modelling results based on fiber properties and fiber constituent materials (lignin, cellulose, and hemicellulose).
Similar(55)
The average errors of the model results compared with the experimental data are all less than 10% in the experimental cases.
Model results compared favorably with independent observations from a 400 m flux tower and a process-based ecosystem model (BIOME-BGC), but only after removing vapor pressure deficit as a constraint on photosynthesis from the MODIS global algorithm.
Overall the model results compared well with measured data in all test cases and established confidence in using the model to explore new design concepts for oxy-coal combustion.
Finite element modeling results compared with field examples of a natural contractional fault-related fold show that well-designed geomechanical modeling can match overall fold geometries and be applied to stress, fracture, and subseismic fault prediction in geologic structures.
Marzeion noted that the model's results compare nicely to the data of previous time periods.
The model results were compared with results from field measurements.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com