Sentence examples for model predictions observed from inspiring English sources

While experimental kinematics and bone strains closely matched model predictions, observed pelvic fractures did not consistently agree with the model, and could not be solely explained by vehicle geometry.

Only the position and duration of the first break differs somewhat from the model prediction: observed breaks begin later and last longer than predicted by the model.

These predictions matched rather well with the timing of metamorphoses observed in each treatment group, with largest deviations between model predictions and observed patters being mainly in the beginning and in the end of each metamorphosis pattern (Fig. 2).

A good correspondence between measured soil response and model predictions was observed.

The best correlation between the experimental data and model predictions was observed with the variable diffusivity model.

Results are compatible with experimental data; the correlation coefficient between our model predictions and observed 27-day GCR variation is 0.80 ± 0.05.

The most intense model Raman peaks associated with uranyl-oxalate vibrational modes in [UO2(OH2)4]2+-Ox30(H2O) are found at 1235 (C-Os) and 1380 (C-Oas); hence, there is significant disagreement between the model predictions and observed Raman frequencies.

Another objective was to compare model predictions with observed data.

The correlation between model predictions and observed hospitalization rates was 0.93 (p<0.001).

Further, the optimization algorithm exhibited better convergence properties with regularization, although no significant improvements in the model predictions was observed.

Figure 3 demonstrates an overall comparison of model predictions and observed data, showing that the majority of predictions are within 3-fold of the data.