Exact(54)
The best-fit model of nucleotide evolution suggested for it by MrModeltest was GTR + I + G.
MrModeltest suggested GTR + I + G as the best-fit model of nucleotide evolution for 5.8S + ITS2, K80 for partial 5.8S, and GTR + I + G for the whole dataset.
For Bayesian analyses we employed the GTR+I+G model of nucleotide evolution.
A GTR+I+G model of nucleotide evolution was assumed with all parameters of the model estimated during the analysis.
We used Modeltest 3.7 [65] to determine the best fit model of nucleotide evolution following the Akaike information criterion [66].
The complete edited alignment of all human and chimpanzee DUXY sequences was used in MODELTEST [65] to determine the model of nucleotide evolution best fitting the sequences.
Similar(6)
Applications to models of nucleotide evolution, recombination, the Wright-Fisher process, coalescence, genetic mapping, sequence analysis.
The best-fit models of nucleotide evolution were estimated by MrModeltest v. 2.3 (Nylander, [2004]), with Akaike Information Criterion as a relative quality measure of the model (Posada and Buckley, [2004]).
As described for the mitochondrial analyses, the most appropriate models of nucleotide evolution for the ML and Bayesian analyses were determined to be HKY+I+G for Tub1 and TrN+I+G for Tub2.
Data specific models of nucleotide evolution were evaluated with ModelTest [ 45] by the AIC criterion.
Modeltest 3.0 [ 49] was used to choose models of nucleotide evolution.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com