According to the radio propagation model of distance-dependent path loss with lognormal fading [25], we have: {P}_rleft({d}_rright)={P}_0-eta 10{ log}_{10}left(frac{d_i}{d_0}right)+{X}_{sigma_i} (22).
When data were pooled across all years and split only by method, a multiple regression model of distances to major habitat types was significant using MCP territory sizes (1993 1999) (F = 2.874, df = 3,93, P = 0.040), but not when using INT territory sizes (F = 0.560, df = 3,53, P = 0.644).
Three conceptual models of dispersal (sum of curve points model, area of distance range model, and the volume of distance range model) are described and applied to a grid landscape with a single point of dispersal and a grid landscape with multiple points of dispersal.
These tests examine spatial patterns of genetic relatedness, and compare different models of distance.
Here, we employed partial Mantel correlations to assess the fit of the craniometric data to the six alternative models based on a null model of geographic distance, while correcting for temporal distance.
Gaussian mixture modeling of distances between binding sites and motifs was performed with R package mclust (Fraley & Raftery, 2002).
We also tested the NJ method [ 76] using different models of distances implemented in PROTDIST.
