Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(9)
The model obtained an R2p of 0.93 and RPD of 4.09, indicating that the model is adequate for analytical purposes.
The discrimination ability model obtained an AUC (95%% CI) 0.81 (0.72 to 0.898).
The discrimination ability model obtained an AUC (95 % CI) of 0.808 (0.72 to 0.89).
Also, the two factor model obtained an unacceptable standardized root mean residual model fit (RMSR = .09), and also a lower percentage of explained variance (53.99%).
On the training data, our optimal model obtained an accuracy of 80.5%.
When omitting the latter and fitting the local dependence, a unidimensional model obtained an appropriate fit to the data = 0.06 0.05-0.08)).
Similar(51)
Based on the model obtained a feedforward as well as a feedback controller were designed.
From the model obtained, a milder reaction condition with a theoretical 98.0% of FAMEs content was created and tested to evaluate its accuracy.
Confirmatory factor analyses showed that the one-factor model obtained a good fit for the GPQ-18 and acceptable for the GPQ-9.
The corrected model obtained a statistical significant result explaining 13.3% of the variance but with moderate effect.
The FOM PCH based regression model obtained a coefficient of determination higher than the other Markov-chain based PCH models.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com