Sentence examples for model iv and from inspiring English sources

The efficiencies of single cells with various structural designs follow the descending order model II, model III, model IV and model I.

By comparing the results within Figure 5 with those from Figure 2, we can observe that the multiaccess schemes have a similar behavior for Model IV and Model I.

However, such simplification cannot change the semiparametric, nonproportional nature of model (iv) and is not pursued.

In the above sections, interesting findings include the nonlinear relationships found in model (iv) and the discrepancy between the models most suitable for estimation and prediction.

The same held for the 24-weeks outcome, where model (ii) had an average (st.dev) AUC of 0.81 (0.02), significantly higher (p<0.0001) than model (iv) and (v), with AUC of 0.75 (0.03) and 0.74 (0.03), respectively.

To further quantify whether the differences between the estimates under model (iv) and those under the other five models are significant, we consider the following bootstrap-based likelihood ratio tests [16].

On the other hand, models (iv) and (v) were always significantly outperformed by models (i) to (iii) at any time point (all p<0.0001).

Models IV and V are presented in Figure 7.

Like-to-like connectivity could also justify the alignment between shifting and static patch grids used in Models IV and V in this paper.

The number of parameters decreased with increasing model simplicity: Model VII had five parameters (a, b, c, d, f), Models VI and V had four parameters (a, b, c, d), Models IV and III had three parameters (a, b, c), Model II had two parameters (a, b) and Model I had one parameter (a).

ML, IK & OH; responsible for (i) calculations and statistical analyses (ii) analysis plan and study design (iii) development of logistic regression model (iv) interpretation and conclusion of results and (v) writing of manuscript.