Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(7)
The first model is empirical, based on the observation that the maximal specific metal uptake courses vs. pH presents a logistic pattern.
However, this model requires measurements of CPB temperature during the prediction periods and does not consider the effects of the mixture recipe and mechanical load (e.g., stress) and deformation (e.g., consolidation); that is, the model is empirical.
The Freundlich model is empirical in nature and is expressed as. q_{text{e }} = K_{text{f}} C_{text{e}}^{1/n}where Ce is the equilibrium concentration (mg/L), qe is the amount of metal ion bound to per gram of the biomass at equilibrium (mg/L), and Kf and n are the Freundlich constants related to the sorption capacity and sorption intensity of the sorbent, respectively.
Fit to an IRT model is empirical evidence that the observed responses can be explained by an underlying structure.
Good fit to a one-dimensional IRT model is empirical evidence that the observed item responses can be explained by one continuous underlying trait.
This model is empirical and does not predict effective oxygen concentration as a function of temperature-dependent changes in oxygen solubility and diffusion.
Similar(52)
Unfortunately, most of these models are empirical and require adjustable parameters.
The forecast models are empirical nonlinear regression models designed for use in an automated data retrieval and forecasting platform.
However, most of the existing models are empirical in nature, which limits their applicability and predictive power.
In general, these models are empirical or phenomenological and contain parameters that must be determined using constant, and in some cases variable, amplitude fatigue data for the material system in question.
These models are empirical in nature and consider the watershed as a non-deterministic system for simplification in calculations, on the other hand, very few models are available for accurate estimation of sedimentograph from the storm event.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com