Suggestions(1)
Exact(7)
Model infant foods were prepared by colyophilization of lactose, β-lactoglobulin (β-LG), and gelatinized starch.
Model infant formulas were prepared by colyophilization of 3 components (lactose, β-lactoglobulin, and gelatinized starch).
Nonenzymatic browning was studied in model infant formulas by yellow color changes of samples at 11.3, 43.2, 54.5, and 75.4% RH.
According to this model, infant survival probability was most strongly affected by takeover of the alpha-male position (Table 2).
The strength of this study comes from its design and use of both binary and continuous variables to model infant nutritional status.
These factors included maternal age and race, primary expected payer (in the all-payer model), infant birth weight, and maternal conditions including maternal distress, placenta previa, hypertension, pre-eclampsia, pre-existing or gestational diabetes, herpes, HIV, and prior myomectomy.
Similar(53)
When the place of residence was replaced by a household wealth index in the final model, infants born to mothers from poor households had a significantly high risk of infant death (HR = 1.81; CI: 1.15 2.83).
Adjusting for the risk factors in the final model, infants born to HIV-positive mothers had higher probability of severe growth restriction than those of HIV-negative mothers, although this did just not reach statistical significance due to lack of statistical power (aRR: 1.33, 95% CI: 0.98 1.79; P = 0.067).
To our knowledge, only one prior study has modeled infant PCB concentrations as a function of maternal PCB concentrations at delivery or postnatally.
If we were modeling infant weight, a negative covariance between the intercept and the linear slope term would indicate that infants who were lighter at birth grew faster postnatally, for example.
In the multivariate models, infants with co-detection of HRV + RSV stayed 4.5 extra days (p = 0.004), when compared to infants without the co-detection.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com