The model indicated that lower hydration period and temperature favor the formation of absorbent with higher surface area.
The addition of psychological measures (model 4) to the regression model, indicated that lower scores on resilience (ß = −0.11, P = 0.04) predicted a larger WC (cm).
Field trial results generally indicated lower operator exposure levels than indicated by the most relevant operator exposure predictive model.
The Aq comparative model indicated that the lower half of the P1 and P4 pockets contain a hydrophilic region due to the presence of a Glu and a Ser residue, respectively.
Analysis of the breakthrough curves according to the Wheeler Jonas model indicated that the high RH lowered the dynamic adsorption capacity (WE) but had nearly no effect on the critical bed weight (WC).
The model indicated that GFRP bars with larger diameters exhibited lower rates of capacity loss.
The 2 3 μg/m3 variation in PM2.5 annual values from the model indicates a somewhat lower background than expected.
Both effect models indicated a significantly lower incidence with ibandronate than with placebo (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.96, p=0.003, fixed effects; I=58%).
The results of the isotherm models indicate the lower coordination capability of secondary adsorption process due to higher affinity and availability of primary carboxy group on the metal cation.
Predictions based on the 'number of days' model indicate that the 25% lower price could result in people doing an additional half a day of sports and exercise and the latter two and half additional days.
Subscripts indicate lower teeth.
