Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(7)
In line with this, Setzer et al. (2013) analyzed binary solution-behavior indicators by means of a hierarchical generalized linear model including random intercepts for person and institution (but without random item intercepts or explanatory person and item variables).
In each of our analyses, we started with a base model including random per-participant and per-item variation.
A mixed model including random effects for slide and animal was fit to the expression data for each gene using GLM procedure in SAS.
We found substantial variation in reaction norms between t of individuals in response to cover, as the model including random intercept and slope was superior to the model containing random intercept only (dAICc = 11.4).
Adding FIP+FIP2 increased the multiple R to 69.9%, with the full model including random effects of batch, chamber and batch×chamber (but omitting FIP3 and FIP4) explaining 76.6%.
Within an observational longitudinal dataset, we compared three techniques; two 'standard' approaches (a linear mixed model, and a Poisson mixed model), and a two-part joint mixed model (a binomial/Poisson mixed distribution model), including random intercepts and random slopes.
Similar(53)
The linear mixed model included random intercepts for subject, visits, and circular test pattern [10].
The linear mixed model included random intercepts for subject, visits, eye, and circular test pattern [10].
The model included random intercepts and random slopes for time.
The model included random effects for the general practice.
Model includes random effects for patient and infusion within patient.
More suggestions(13)
models including random
model includes random
model comprised random
model incorporating random
model contained random
model considering random
model including multi-aim
model including dynamic
model including subcritical
model including global
model including latent
model including phylogenetic
model including only
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com