Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(4)
Assuming that heterogeneity exists in findings across studies, we adopted a random effects model in Review Manager 5.0 (Cochrane Collaboration) 11 to obtain a summary estimate of the average effect with its 95% confidence interval.
Differences in percentage mammographic density between the isoflavone-rich intervention and control periods were combined across studies using mean differences (MD) using a random effects model in Review Manager 5.0 software (2008).
Meta-analyses pooling available data for events of labour and birth (induction of labour, no analgesia, epidural use and caesarean section) and infant outcomes (preterm birth, birthweight <2500 g, Apgar ≤7, stillbirths and neonatal deaths) were carried out using a random effects model in Review Manager, version 4.2.10.
Because several studies did not use a control group but instead used a control (no treatment) vs. experimental condition comparison in the same subjects, we used a random effect meta-analysis model in Review Manager to compute weighted mean effect sizes (Higgins et al. 2003).
Similar(56)
Note that the ALCAM model is different from the All Level Crossings Risk Model (ALCRM) that was developed in the United Kingdom and was categorized as a complex weighted factor model in that review.
Reizner et al. reported no such model in their review of the literature [ 13].
We only identified one paper of restorative home care [ 58] and could not include this model in the review.
Data were combined using the DerSimonian-Laird random effects models 25 in Review Manager version 5.0 (Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark).
Additionally, mouse models listed in review articles on autism, along with cross-references therein, were mapped and incorporated into the PubMed search lists.
A fixed effect model was used in 33 reviews (55%), and a random effects model in 27 reviews (the Cochrane software does not allow mixed models [ 8]).
A brief review on the rheological models was presented in "Review over the viscoelastic models".
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com