Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
The 2- and 4-week OAB model groups exhibited significant increases in BP and MVP, as well as bladder capacity, compared with the corresponding sham groups.
Similar(58)
The model group exhibited significantly highlighted regions of Gd-DTPA after post-contrast at the corresponding areas and time points compared with the sham group (P < 0.05).
With regard to NVC, only 42%% (5 of 12 rats) of the 2-week OAB model group exhibited statistical differences compared with the sham group.
However, the mice in the model group exhibited depression, reduced activity, and a lackluster coat, all of which are typical manifestations of diabetes.
At 4 and 6 weeks, the OAB model group exhibited significant differences in residual volume (RV) and non-voiding contraction frequency.
The liver tissue samples from the model group exhibited more fatty degeneration, more steatosis, cell necrosis, and infiltration of inflammatory cells and there were more collagen deposition compared with the control group.
Results of the first part indicated that at 2 and 4 weeks, the OAB model group exhibited significant differences in urodynamic parameters, including bladder pressure, maximum voiding pressure, and maximum bladder capacity, compared with the sham group.
Evaluations of the weight of the rats and the control of blood pressure, temperature, and hydration were all adequately performed in our model; the groups exhibited homogeneous behaviors.
In the present prognostic model, risk groups exhibited well-separated survival curves that reflected the prognosis of good/excellent performance status of metastatic renal-cell carcinoma patients receiving outpatient IL-2/IFN α2a.
The neurological deficit scores of the Model, Non-acup-5Hz and Non-acup-25Hz groups exhibited nonsignificant differences (P > 0.05).
Mitochondrial Bcl-2/Bax and Bcl-xL/Bax expression in the Model, Non-acup-5Hz, and Non-acup-25Hz groups exhibited nonsignificant differences (P > 0.05).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com