Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(7)
Good qualitative agreement is found between the results of the experiments and the model predictions, although the model generally predicts higher fin temperatures and ignition of reaction to occur at lower temperatures.
The results indicate that the mobile-mobile model generally predicts the concentration breakthrough curves (BTCs) of the reactive compound better.
The soot model generally predicts soot volume fractions to be two to three orders of magnitude lower than those obtained experimentally, and the model predicts inception of soot to occur approximately 100 K below experimental observations.
The RegCM3 climate model generally predicts a 10 to 20% increase of DMR for the Middle East, but change of MAP varies between -20 and +10% [ 56- 58].
For rainbow trout, after 4 days, the PBTK model generally predicts higher internal concentrations than the one-compartment approaches, which is in agreement with Figure 4 (see values for the same log KOW and lipid fractions in both graphs).
The tuned model generally predicts slower and more accurate choices in the visual condition, leading to the longest-possible reaction time (2 s stimulus time + non-decision time) for all but the highest stimulus coherence.
Similar(53)
Results show that airflow network model generally predict smaller airflow rates for the openings.
For conditions when a noise barrier was present and the ground was absorbent, the incoherent line source model generally predicted significantly higher values of attenuation than those from the barrier and ground attenuation calculated separately.
For example, the FO2 model generally predicted much higher levels of gene family Gain and Expansion.
Climate models generally predict amplified warming in polar regions3,4, as observed in Antarctica's peninsula region over the second half of the 20th century5,6,7,8,9.
In addition, Earth system models generally predict the C input could increase by 25 60% by the end of the twenty-first century53.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com