Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(3)
While considering auditory brain model for subjective responses, effects of spatial factors extracted from the interaural cross-correlation function (IACF) on annoyance of noise stimuli are examined.
into account within the process of building a multi-modal model for subjective quality prediction.
In order to test the proposed model for subjective wellbeing homeostasis, three hierarchical multiple regressions were conducted, one for each time period.
Similar(57)
Prediction models for subjective ratings of discomfort and acceptability provide insight regarding either workstation design or exposure control.
However, lack of quantitative data and undefined relationships between the attributes makes it difficult to develop a quantitative model for analyzing subjective customer satisfaction (CS) attributes.
Our findings support the homeostatic model of subjective wellbeing.
A regression model for accuracy of subjective impression or a model was fitted using the number of ovarian mass scans (7 ordinal categories; <100, 100 200, 200 500, 500 1000, 1000 2000, 2000 5000 and 5000 10 000), background training (sonographer or MD), and tumour outcome (benign or malignant) as predictors.
However, in the combined health and work-related domain, the models were not adjusted for subjective health status to avoid over-adjustment as the baseline variables in this domain were directly related to health status.
Overall time effects analyzed by Friedman tests and generalized linear mixed models indicated significant findings for subjective health status (EQ-5D VAS) and pain/discomfort (an EQ-5D subdimension).
The assessment of the validity of these requirements provides a tool for assessing the relative value of normative models of subjective behaviors.
A factor model for unobserved heterogeneity in subjective quantiles The quantile regression errors capture unobservable heterogeneity in the subjective probability distributions (except for functional form approximation errors).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com