Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
Explicitly modelled solvent atoms contribute to the atomic model (F calc ).
The mask structure factors (F mask ) are averaged in the same manner as the atomic model (F calc ) (4).
Similar(58)
F calc electron-density maps are calculated for each model in the ensemble and 〈 F calc 〉 electron-density map is calculated for the complete ensemble as (10).
R = Σ|F obs − F calc |/Σ Fobs, where F calc is the calculated protein structure factor from the atomic model (R free was calculated with 5% of the reflections selected).
At t = 0 〈 F calc 〉 and 〈 F sol 〉 are set to F calc and F sol. Boltzmann-weighted velocities are assigned to the atoms, corresponding to T = 300 K.
This TLS model produced lower R-values than using the ADP values from the re-refined single structure or using the one overall isotropic B-factor for all atoms in the model (Table 5).> Structure factors for the final ensemble are calculated from the population of collected structure as in (2) where F calc and F mask are defined as (10) and (11).
(12) P i = ρ 〈 F calc 〉 i ρ F calc i. Calculating from an electron-density function allows for non-Gaussian distributions unlike RMSF, which is calculated from mean atomic position.
This approach contrasts with the traditional crystallographic refinement approach, where F calc (hkl) are computed from a single structure and optimized against F obs (hkl).
Every 10 time-steps rolling average structure factors, 〈 F calc 〉 and 〈 F sol 〉, are updated for use in the time-averaged X-ray restraints.
The X-ray restraint optimized 〈 F calc (hkl)〉 against F obs (hkl), where 〈 F calc (hkl)〉 are computed as rolling averages from the structures in the MD trajectory, with the length of the averaging window determined by the relaxation time τ x.
There are large F obs − F calc differences present in the current data as indicated through checkCIF level C PLAT918 alerts, which are due to pixel saturation arising from the use of high-flux radiation.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com