Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Model evaluation indicated that the most viable option to achieve accuracy and efficiency was the use of beam column line elements with fiber-type cross-section models at the integration points.
Similar(59)
Model performance evaluation indicates that both models may be used to estimate C stocks, but DNDC may be better than BGC for assessing the effect of climate change on C dynamics.
Model evaluation (PPC) indicated good performance of the model in simulating the PFS distribution of the pooled studies (Supplementary Figure S6 online) as well as that observed in the different treatment groups (Supplementary Figure S7 online).
Model evaluation (PPC) indicated good performance of the model in simulating the survival distribution of the pooled studies (Supplementary Figure S3 online) as well as that observed in the different treatment groups (Supplementary Figure S4 online).
Internal and external evaluation indicated good model performance for single- and multiple-dose regimens and good model predictions compared with reported external data in healthy adults and CF patients.
Model evaluation statistics indicate good agreement between the model and measurements: r = 0.78 for PM10 (year 2008, 76 measurement sites) and r = 0.74 for PM2.5 (year 2008, 15 sites).
This experimental evaluation indicates that our model is, in most cases, as accurate as these methods, but it is much more efficient.
The results of their evaluation indicate that compression models are surprisingly good and their performances are comparable with Bogofilter, the best spam filter at that time.
The evaluation indicates that the new model is accurate and efficient for simulating upward soil water flow in heterogeneous soils with complex boundary conditions.
Our intensive evaluation indicates the state space based approach is accurate, stable and lightweight comparing to other strategies such as the autoregressive model (Liu and Cerpa, 2010).
Nevertheless, tests of discrimination alone are not sufficient for model evaluation, since they do not indicate whether calibration is also good [ 34, 35, 42].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com