Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(9)
Compared to the experiment, the acute model error was 0.00% by design of the model; the chronic model error was 2.13%, which lies within the rage of the experimental standard deviation.
The performance of the resulting confidence bounds in accurately representing model error was evaluated using both visual inspection for specific events, and rank histograms and range statistics for the simulated model error quantiles.
The standard deviation of the model error was around 6 dB for the best model.
The average percentage model error was 4.0% on 1 August and 3.7% on 22 August.
The ARIMA Wilcox test parameter was V = 778,260 and p value ≤ 0.0001, providing substantial evidence that the true model error was not 0 GB.
In contrast, when no enzyme at the branching reactions was integrated, the model error was relatively large.
Similar(51)
Thus, their conclusion about model error is not demonstrated.
The overall model error is 34.6 km, or 23%.
Input saturation and model error are explicitly incorporated into the analysis.
Model validation and estimating the size of a possible model error is a central aspect of System Identification.
The model error is estimated as the difference between the models given by the straight and curved paths.
More suggestions(2)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com