Sentence examples for model epoch at from inspiring English sources

The absorbance of samples was read on a spectrophotometer Biotek model Epoch at 559 nm, which corresponds to the absorption peaks of positive samples obtained after scanning the spectrum of the supernatant of the above controls from 400 to 700 nm.

Data were extrapolated at model epochs using: (1) for epoch 2005.0, the secular variation and acceleration up to degree 8 obtained by Thébault et al. (2010); (2) for epoch 2010.0, the F secular variation candidate (option #1) or the secular variation candidate associated with each main field candidate (option #2).

The MF model at epoch 2005.0 is made of definitive coefficients and aims at describing the large-scale internal part of the magnetic field of the Earth as accurately as possible for a given epoch within the model limitations.

a The field lines of the axisymmetric component of the initial field model at epoch 2014.3.

Dipole geomagnetic latitudes are calculated using the IGRF-11 model at epoch 2010.

We used the definitive IGRF model at epoch 2000 (Macmillan and Maus, 2005) up to SH degree 13 without time dependency as a starting model m0.

Fig. 9. Lowes-Mauersberger spectra of the vector field differences i, j R n between the IGRF-11 average SV over the interval 2005 to 2010 IGRF-20100 minus DGRF-2005 divided by 5, referred to as SV-2007.5-G11 in the text) and the SV candidate models considered for IGRF-10 epoch at 2007.5.

We present in Table 2 rms differences between the models, for two different epochs (the mean epoch at 2014.3 and the reference epoch at 2015.0) and for the full expansion (i.e., N max = 25) or that truncated to SH degree and order 13 (corresponding to the IGRF candidate model).

On the third column from the left, the mean residual refers to the average difference between a given measurement and its prediction by the initial model centered at epoch t c =2014.3 (see text for details).

The teams derived their candidate from parent models (see Table 1 for the list of references) and evaluated these parent models at epoch 2010.0.

Fig. 3 Difference at Earth's mean radius between V-ASM and Z-ASM models at epoch 2014.3 and for the full expansion.