Exact(2)
However, the AICc of this model differs by 15.21 units from the AICc of the best model.
For the eIF2Bα2 homodimer, the highest-scoring model differs by only a 3.5 Å interface root-mean-square deviation (rmsd) from the dimer interface seen in the crystal structure, thus reproducing the experimentally confirmed eIF2Bα2 homodimer.
Similar(58)
Multi-group analyses indicated that some paths in the GPA model differ by gender while those in the Mathematics model differ by type of school.
Predictions of the flow at full scale inferred from measurements of pressure and flow speed made at the side-wall openings of the model differed by less than 10%and28%8%, respectively, from measurements made in the full-size greenhouse.
The accuracy test described by Freese ([1960]) was used to test whether the calculations from Maestra and those from the stand-level model differed by > 10% with a 95% confidence limit (α = 0.05).
In the preliminary study (Additional file 2), it was observed that contrast recoveries obtained at a 4-year interval with two cameras of the same model differed by less than 10% for all but one of the hot rods and for the largest cold rods.
For this analysis, we considered only those models where the sequence length of transcript-derived model differed by greater than 10% (plus or minus) from the initial Myc-BestModel.
When the deviance estimates for the linear and the best-fitted threshold model differed by less than 3.84 (χ for 1 df at the p = 0.05 level), we chose the simpler linear model.
The estimated risk derived from the quartiles differed from the true absolute risk by more than 5% for close to one third of subjects; in contrast, the predicted risk from the spline model differed by more than 5% for about one in 15, close an 80% relative reduction in the risk of an inaccurate estimate.
In exploratory analyses, we evaluated whether the association with lymphedema for each of the variables in the final multivariable model differed by timing of lymphedema onset; to do this, we created an interaction term using a time-dependent indicator for follow-up (12 months or less, longer than 12 months).
Figure 2 depicts how the performance of the models differs by target class.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com