Sentence examples for model comparisons performed from inspiring English sources

In practice and despite all model comparisons performed in recent years, little guidance can be provided regarding the selection of 'best' ENM algorithms for transferability [49].

All model comparisons were performed with chi-square (χ 2) tests.

All parameter fits and model comparisons were performed by MCMC sampling with the GPstuff toolbox version 4.6 in MATLAB.

Model comparisons were performed based on log-likelihood ratios, using the Akaike information criterion (AIC), and the Bayesian Information Criterion BICC).

Model comparisons were performed by a Bayes Factor analysis [43].

Model comparisons were performed using Akaike information criterion (AIC).

Model comparisons were performed based on a practical improvement in model-fit approach (TLI difference ≥ 0.01) [ 40, 41].

Analyses and model comparisons were performed in the R package 'Splits' using the 'gmyc' and 'compare' functions.

All model comparisons are performed under ML on a fixed tree topology, which is estimated with the bionj algorithm (Gascuel 1997) implemented in phyml (Guindon et al. 2010) that uses a model of the variance and covariance of evolutionary distances.

LRTs of the following model comparisons were performed to detect sites under positive selection: M1a (nearly neutral) with M2a (positive selection); M7 with M8 (β and ωs ≥1); and M8a (β and ωs = 1) with M8.

Model comparison was performed via Bayes Factor in Tracer v1.5 (Text S1; Tables S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, S6, S7, and S8); differences in tMRCA estimates among models were trivial.