Sentence examples for model comparison using from inspiring English sources
In addition to just comparing the small samples of neurons that were classified as matched vs mismatched congruency, we now perform a model comparison using the data from all 127 pairs of neurons, which gives us substantially greater power.
In contrast, the standard deviation estimated by a single model, which was also used in the multiple model comparison using three different land-use datasets, was 0.27 PgC year−1 (Jain et al. [2013]).
Model comparison using the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), the Schwarz Bayseian Information Criterion (BIC) and the Bayes Factor allows direct comparison of model results irrespective of the number of model parameters.
Furthermore, we also performed a simulation study, assessing the veracity of parameter estimation and model comparison using synthetic data for which the ground truth was known.
Adult survival clearly varied between habitat types as a model with constant (habitat-independent) survival and transition probabilities Sp received much lower support than the habitat-dependent model S[hab]pψ [hab] (based on model comparison using Akaike's Information Criterion corrected for effective sample size AICc [46], difference between AICc values Δ AICc = 90.4).
Model comparison using Akaike information criterion (AIC).
Model comparison used Kullback-Leibler information to assign relative strength of evidence (Akaike's Information Criterion corrected for small samples [AICc, 26, 35]) to each model in the set [ 26].
Some studies have carried out model comparisons using simulated data.
We evaluated the assumption of a linear trend between weight change and UI through model comparisons using chi-squared tests.
Model comparisons, using PLL, in the simulation study typically favoured the BS t models over the BN-∞ model when the true models were heavy-tailed.
Biogeographic model comparisons using the fossil-tip dated phylogeny consistently favored ancestral area estimations based on the LDD + terrestrial model (Table 1).
