Suggestions(5)
Exact(7)
The simplified model compares very well with the exact model, especially for high barrier resistances.
The model compares very well with new data provided here for droplets on a rotating disk and liquid slug flow in microchannel.
The model compares very well with experimental results, confirming the formulated hypothesis that the internal layer damage does not markedly contribute to the quasi-isotropic laminate failure.
It can be seen from Fig. 8 that the pull-out force estimated from the 3-D model compares very well with the average value of the pull-out force obtained from the experimental tests (Shuaib et al. 2003).
This new approximate model compares very well with the exact (numerical) solution of the general adsorption and diffusion model over a wide range of (Langmuir) isotherm nonlinearity, and pore and surface diffusivities.
In particular, it is shown that the surrogate model compares very well with reference results at both the macroscale and the structural scale, even for moderate-order expansions, and that the aforementioned closest approximations constitute very accurate approximation provided that the subset onto which the homogenized response is projected is properly chosen.
Similar(53)
The moment rotation curves obtained by the mathematical model compare very satisfactorily with the experimental results.
The results obtained from the model compare very well with the experimental results available in the literature.
The simulation results from the FSI model compare very well with the experimental data for steady sailing conditions.
The results from this model compare very well with nonlinear finite element simulations with respect to both the equilibrium paths and panel deformations.
Subsequently, three examples of linearized time-invariant (LTI) transmission systems are solved, and eigensolution predictions of the multi-body dynamics model compare very well with finite element calculations.
More suggestions(2)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com