Ai Feedback
Exact(8)
The model compares favourably with the exact (numerical) solution for a variety of cases.
It was found that our model compares favourably well with conventional ANFIS model.
The model compares favourably with some experimental results in the literature.
The NN model compares favourably with the IRI model, based on RMS error.
The model compares favourably with previous models in terms of accuracy and simplicity and does not require new empirical constants.
Robustness testing and validation of model compares favourably with the experimental results with percentage difference of 2.78% for the analysis time.
Similar(52)
The results of this model compare favourably with data measured during construction.
The predicted results generated by the computer model compare favourably with those measured in the experimental runs presented.
The values of Q e obtained from the second order model compared favourably well with the experimental values with the estimated errors less than 5%%.
The results of Finite Element (FE) analyses of the parent material specimen tests, using a creep continuum damage material model, compared favourably with those obtained from the experiments.
[18F]Fludarabine uptake in the follicular lymphoma model compared favourably with [18F]FDG in terms of specificity for PET imaging and also remained robust for persistent viable tissues following rituximab therapy.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com