Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(3)
Exact(2)
The mean biomass calculated from the three different allometric model choices was somewhat variable, although none of the estimates was significantly different from the others (P < 0.05).
Any assessment of the difficulty of achieving a particular set of model choices was thus exogenous to the model.
Similar(58)
Some good model choices are proposed and explored.
Additionally, the evaluation criteria to assess the number of statistically accurate model choices are defined.
In both cases, the final model choice was based on the analyses of residuals.
Model choice was performed in MODELTEST 3.6 [118] by the likelihood ratio test with significance level set at 1%. ML trees are available upon request.
Model choice was guided by the lowest Akaike criteria value.
A motivation of the model choice was only provided in 27.3% of the studies.
This differs from past practice when model choice was conducted without statistical justification or by choosing the most parameter-rich model available [ 6, 8].
However, this should not be a problem as we showed that model choice was not a major determinant of the opsin relationships (see Results).
However, it is typically applied ad hoc: conditioning on the top SNPs, with limited exploration of the model space and no assessment of how sensitive model choice was to sampling variability.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com