Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(60)
In the past, the hydraulic model calibration was the main driver of the sampling design.
Model calibration was performed based on experimental measurements of the resonance frequency and diaphragm displacement.
A consistent protocol to model calibration was applied to all models.
Model calibration was done against experimental data from previously completed lab-scale reactor experiments.
Model calibration was achieved by first determining the most sensitive parameters for heat and multiphase flow effects.
A key to accurate model calibration was selection of points from areas of spatially-homogeneous proximal ECa.
The model calibration was based on the key soil parameters and fine measurements of water content at different depths.
Model calibration was carried out using four membranes that differed in terms of material selection, effective pore size, thickness and porosity.
The effect of the model calibration was tested by comparing the manual calibration approach with automatic calibrations of the VHM model based on different objective functions.
A set of thresholds for characterising quality of model calibration was defined using r-squared value, with Good (> 0.8), Fair (0.6 0.8), Moderate (0.4 0.6) and Poor (< 0.4).
Errors were reduced by 36.9% (above uncalibrated model performance) when both WRF model data assimilation and hydrological model calibration was utilized.
More suggestions(3)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com