Transfer predictions by the model are very realistic.
The comparisons with results obtained with a refined shell finite element model are very satisfactory.
Some of the bronzes, cast solid by the "lost wax" process (using a wax model), are very fine, the earliest being the best.
The traditional least squares estimators used in multiple linear regression model are very sensitive to design anomalies.
The larger screens of the Powerbook line, including the 13.3-inch model we tested and the practically cinematic 14.1-inch model, are very impressive and worth the extra money.
The models that take into account fundamentals — ours at Election Lab, The Upshot's Leo and 538's — do not draw on an identical set of factors, but the factors in each model are very similar nonetheless.
For the standard DPLP of the literature, the solution values of the suggested model are very near to the results of adaptive approach.
The mass and stiffness of the riser model are very low, and the Reynolds number in the experiment ranged from 400 to 600.
Although stochastic volatility models and local volatility model are very popular among the market practitioner for exotic option pricing and hedging, they have several critical defects both in theory and practice.
The results of the enhanced version of the model are very accurate whereas those of the previous version are erratic for the considered joint.
Calculation results of point, line and area source model are very close to each other, thus simpler model like point source model and line source model would be more applicable in engineering applications.
