Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(4)
Figure 1 Snapshot of the atomistic model and plot of free energy.
We simulate the corresponding stochastic model and plot the spatio-temporal graphs of the 1-D cortex in Fig. 3(c) (bird's-eye view) and (d) (3-D view) showing the Turing Hopf interaction.
Finally, to simplify our analysis, we focus our simulations only on the case where de novo synthesis takes place, setting kfission = kfusion = 0. We then ran the simulations of Model 2 and Model 3 10,000 times, built up the organelle copy number distributions resulting from each model and plot the Fano factors of these distributions below.
Repeating such random trials 1,000 times and calculating average accuracy (81.3 ± 1.3%), we chose a result approaching average accuracy to build model and plot ROC curve which allowed for a true positive rate TPR = 74.71%, a false positive rate FPR = 8.62%, and area under the curve AUC = 0.8627.
Similar(56)
A general-purpose numerical solver is used for solving the model and plotting the pertinent results.
To predict and establish the safe hot workability window, processing maps were evaluated based on the dynamic material model and plotted for strain of 0.65.
We inferred phylogenies for each sample with PHYML (version 2.4.4, [43]) using the F81 DNA substitution model, and plotted the resulting trees with the APE package (version 2.4, [44]) in R (version 2.10.0, [45], http://www.r-project.org).org
The first workflow numerically simulates the ODEs of the model and plots resulting trajectories.
The delta between predicted and measured value is calculated for both model and plotted against each other.
We saw no significant interaction between any of the main variables in the final model, and plots of model residuals indicated that these associations were approximately linear.
For each SCOP family in the training set, we trained an ordinary HMM model and plotted the ROC curve and calculated the AUC for this task.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com