Sentence examples for model analysis on from inspiring English sources

We present a stylized model analysis on the economic incentives for emissions abatement of producers subjected to carbon tariffs.

Through elaborate element model analysis on composite decks subjected to vertically flexural and axially compressive loads, respectively, the longitudinal distribution characteristic of effective width are determined.

This sociological study sets a precedent by using quantitative analysis and model analysis on Chinese ethnic intermarriages.

13717_2013_25_MOESM1_ESM.doc Additional file 1: Results of the null model analysis on the five bacteria-phage networks. DOC 42 KB) 13717_2013_25_MOESM2_ESM.png Additional file 2: Figure S1: Visualisation of the five networks sampled in this study.

In their factor model analysis on exchange rates, Ranaldo and Söderlind (2010) define a safe haven currency to be a currency that offers hedging value against global risk, both on average and in particular so in crisis episodes.

A mixed model analysis on the slopes and the intercepts of the best fitting lines (three fixed factors: Stimulus, Task, and Direction) proved the difference between the tasks (slopes: F 1,13) = 238.56, p<0.01; intercepts: F 1,13) = 182.39, p<0.01), whereas the Direction factor did not significantly affect the subjects' performance.

To confirm the actuation mechanism of proposed pump model, a numerical simulation analysis on the proposed model was implemented.

Mixed-model analysis on difference scores (T2 minus T1) revealed there were no significant main intervention effects for girl BMI z-scores (F1, 5 = 0.42, p =.544); or Parent BMI (F1, 5 = 1.58, p =.264).

Mixed-model analysis on difference scores revealed no significant main intervention effects for: Parent FV consumption (F1, 5 = 1.94, p =.223); Parent eating with TV (F1, 5 = 1.55, p =.269); Parent MVPA (F1, 5 = 0.87, p =.393); and Parent SSB consumption.

Mixed-model analysis on difference scores revealed no significant main intervention effects for: Girl FV servings (F1, 5 = 1.54, p =.269); Girl MVPA (F1, 5 = 0.09, p =.779); Girl SSB consumption (F1, 5 = 0.41, p =.549); or Girl eating with TV, (F1, 5 = 0.63, p =.463).

Thus, we get the equivalent model, (8) Now, we can go on the model analysis based on the new equivalent model (8).