Suggestions(5)
Exact(6)
Being obese on three occasions prior to Phase 5 was associated also with a 6-hour/week increase in total leisure-time sitting (Model A) relative to the reference category.
In this model, a relative particle size ratio is introduced for describing the breakage characteristics of particles with different size, and the transformation of particle shape is considered in the inter-particle breakage.
The smallest contribution to the model, a relative increase of 0.32% in RSS, is that of the gene Co-Ex network.
Despite an increase in the use of CHWs as the first source of care for fast/difficult breathing in model A relative to model B communities, the between-group difference was not significant.
Since differences between both scores are mainly related to the consideration of tree distances between metabolites and reactions in the TDB model, a relative score ∑ = S TDB / S CMB > 1 (< 1) points to the presence of tree distance correlations (anticorrelations) in the bipartite network, which are absent in the random case.
This sample size will make it possible to detect as significant, in a Cox regression model, a relative risk of 1.3 or more associated with greater delay, assuming an exposure to this possibility of 50% and a censored data percentage of 50% (Security: 95%; Statistical power: 80%).
Similar(54)
In light of the generic difficulties and the relative robustness of BST models, we decided to construct our dopamine model as a "relative" model based on expert knowledge.
In some animal models, a relative insulin receptor insufficiency accompanied by increased plasma triglyceride concentrations during the development of obesity was observed, which is similar to the pathogenesis of insulin resistance in humans.
A relative distance of 0.0 from the category-selective model corresponds to an exact match to this model, and a relative distance of 1.0 corresponds to an exact match to the image-selective model.
For example, the DIETRON model uses a relative risk of 0.81 for CHD mortality for every 10 g/d increase in fibre intake.
The simulation based on a functional model gives a relative error lower than 1%, which is 4 times lower than that with offset.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com