That is, all the column vectors along the mode n are arranged into a matrix.
The vacuum frequencies f n, vac for each mode n were determined far from the surface (H » 1), where the added mass coefficient can be calculated for higher modes, with normalized mode number κ, according to the theory by Van Eysden and Sader [21]: a m = π ρ f b 4 ρ c h ℜ Γ VanEysden R e, κ f o r H ≫ 1 (7).
For the MET mode, g N is set as 0.66343 g/mmol, which is the molar mass of NADH, and for the DET mode, g N is set as 0.8869 g/mmol, which is the molar mass of cytochrome c.
The AIC is defined as AIC = -2 ln L+2 k, and the BIC is defined as BIC = -2 ln L+ k ln(N), where ln L is the maximized log likelihood of the model and k is the number of parameters in the mode, and N is the sample size.
The coupling condition can be calculated from the well-known grating equation where n eff is the effective refractive index of the waveguide mode, n c is the refractive index of the cover layer, θ is the coupling angle, m is the diffraction order, λ0 is the wavelength in free space, and λ is the grating period.
The direct result of this nanoscale is the small mode volume V, which is 1.08 and 0.94(λ/n)3 for optimized modes O and A, respectively, where λ is the mode wavelength and n is the refractive index at the point of maximal light intensity.
The mode energy E n is always measured relative to the middle of the well; the latter always coincides with the bottom energy for the square (un-biased) QW, as shown in Fig. 1.
As an example, Table 1 shows the profiles of five transmission modes, where β n is the modulation and coding rate in terms of bits/symbol for mode n.
To allow the amount of noise to vary with the task mode, each N was multiplied by Aa, Am, and Aext, which were assumed to be 1.0 in the dual-task mode but a variable in the single-task mode.
