Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
The result of each diagnostic modality was compared with that of the surgical specimen obtained by extensive lymph node dissection in 30 (69.8%) patients.
Next, each participant's categorization for each modality was compared to the reference standard, and the results were compared against the binomial distribution for categorical data.
Reliability was evaluated with an ICC 2,1) and this ICC for each measurement modality was compared by use of ANOVA with a Tukey post hoc test.
Similar(57)
Initially, the results generated in this experimental modality were compared with those that were obtained in conventional submerged fermentation.
Distributions of mean IQV per question in each modality were compared by the mean of paired Wilcoxon tests or Friedman tests.
Utilization rates of each modality were compared between the two groups.
Utilization rates of each modality were compared between physicians and non-physicians, and odds ratios of the utilization of each radiology modality were measured.
The results of the 2-week follow-up MCQ and post-teaching MCQ were not statistically significant when each modality were compared.
The efficacy of the treatment modalities was compared with the assessment of the patients before the therapy at the end of the therapy, and in third month after the therapy.
Furthermore, the skin doses for both modalities were compared.
For lesion detection, detection rates of the three modalities were compared using McNemar's test.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com